Publicidad:
La Coctelera

p14.9871

med. intensiva, artículos noticias comentarios

15 Septiembre 2006

Intensive care in obstetrics: An evidence-based review Parte II

Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy (amniotic fluid embolus)
Amniotic fluid embolism is a rare but devastating complication of pregnancy that is characterized by acute onset of hypoxia, hypotension or cardiac arrest, and coagulopathy that occur during labor and delivery or within 30 minutes after delivery.113,114 This same constellation of findings may be caused by other causes such as hemorrhage, uterine rupture, or sepsis, each of which should be excluded before assignment of a diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism. The combination of sudden cardiovascular and respiratory collapse with a coagulopathy is quite similar to that observed in patients with anaphylactic or septic shock. In each of these settings, a foreign substance (eg, endotoxin) is introduced into the circulation. This incites a cascade of events that result in the activation and release of mediators such as histamines, thromboxane and prostaglandins, which lead to disseminated coagulation, hypotension, and hypoxia. In this scenario, the inciting factor is presumed to be present in amniotic fluid that is introduced into the maternal circulation, yet the precise factors that initiate the sequence have yet to be identified. It is a commonly held misconception that the presence of fetal debris in the pulmonary circulation is diagnostic of an amniotic fluid embolus. In fact, fetal debris can be found in the pulmonary circulation in a predominance of normal laboring patients and is only identified in 78% of those patients who meet the criteria for the diagnosis of amniotic fluid embolism.113,114

Management of amniotic fluid embolism is entirely supportive. Replacement of blood and clotting factors, adequate hydration and blood pressure support, ventilatory support, and invasive cardiac monitoring in addition to resuscitation efforts are all generally required for these patients. Recent data suggest mortality rates approach >=61%. Most patients do not survive the initial course and die within 5 days. Of those patients who survive, neurologic impairment is common.113

Summary
Pregnant women may require intensive care because of complications of the pregnancy itself or as a result of nonobstetric conditions. In either setting, care of the critically ill pregnant woman requires knowledge of the primary disease process and its treatment in nonpregnant patients and a thorough understanding of maternal physiologic adaptations to pregnancy. Because there are frequently no data or literature that could guide intensive care of the pregnant patient, knowledge of maternal physiologic condition must be used to interpret and implement therapies that are studied only in nonpregnant patients. Thus, care should be provided by or in consultation with a maternal fetal medicine specialist or obstetrician who is thoroughly familiar with the management of high-risk pregnancies.

References
1. Baskett T, Sternadel J. Maternal intensive care and near-miss mortality in obstetrics. BJOG 1998;105:981–984. [Context Link]

2. Graham SG, Luxton MC. The requirement for intensive care support for the pregnant population. Anaesthesia 1989;44:581–584. [Context Link]

3. Heinonen S, Tyrvainen E, Saarikoski S, Ruokonen E. Need for maternal critical care in obstetrics: a population-based analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth 2002;11:260–264. [Context Link]

4. Kilpatrick SJ, Matthay MA. Obstetric patients requiring critical care: a five-year review. Chest 1992;101:1407–1412. [Context Link]

5. Lapinsky S, Kruczynski K, Seaward G, Farine D, Grossman R. Critical care management of the obstetric patient. Can J Anaesth 1997;44:325–329. [Context Link]

6. Loverro G, Pansini V, Greco P, Vimercati A, Parisi A, Selvaggi L. Indications and outcome for intensive care unit admission during puerperium. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001;265:195–198. [Context Link]

7. Mabie WC, Sibai BM. Treatment in an obstetric intensive care unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1–4. [Context Link]

8. Mahutte N, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Le Q, Solomon J, Benjamin A, Boyd M. Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:263–266. [Context Link]

9. Tang LC, Kwok AC, Wong AY, Lee YY, Sun KO, So AP. Critical care in obstetrical patients: an eight-year review. Chin Med J (Engl) 1997;110:936–941. [Context Link]

10. Zeeman GG, Wendel GD Jr., Cunningham FG. A blueprint for obstetric critical care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:532–536. [Context Link]

11. El-Solh AA, Grant BJ. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for critically ill obstetric patients. Chest 1996;110:1299–1304. [Context Link]

12. Naylor DF Jr., Olson MM. Critical care obstetrics and gynecology. Crit Care Clin 2003;19:127–149. [Context Link]

13. Knaus W, Wagner D, Draper E, Zimmerman J, Bergner M, Bastos P, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 1991;100:1619–1636. [Context Link]

14. Lewinsohn G, Herman A, Leonov Y, Klinowski E. Critically ill obstetrical patients: outcome and predictability. Crit Care Med 1994;22:1412–1414. [Context Link]

15. Boyd O, Grounds R, Bennett E. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 1993;270:2699–2707. [Context Link]

16. Del Guercio LR, Cohn JD. Monitoring operative risk in the elderly. JAMA 1980;243:1350–1355. [Context Link]

17. Older P, Smith R. Experience with the preoperative invasive measurement of haemodynamic, respiratory and renal function in 100 elderly patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 1988;16:389–395. [Context Link]

18. Gore JM, Goldberg RJ, Spodick DH, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. A community-wide assessment of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chest 1987;92:721–727. [Context Link]

19. Zion M, Balkin J, Rosenmann D, Goldbourt U, Reicher-Reiss H, Kaplinsky E, et al. Use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction: analysis of experience in 5,841 patients in the SPRINT registry: SPRINT study group. Chest 1990;98:1331–1335. [Context Link]

20. Connors A Jr., Speroff T, Dawson N, Thomas C, Harrell F Jr., Wagner D, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients: SUPPORT investigators. JAMA 1996;276:889–897. [Context Link]

21. Hayes M, Timmins A, Yau E, Palazzo M, Hinds C, Watson D. Elevation of systemic oxygen delivery in the treatment of critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1717–1722. [Context Link]

22. Polanczyk C, Rohde L, Goldman L, Cook E, Thomas E, Marcantonio E, et al. Right heart catheterization and cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: an observational study. JAMA 2001;286:309–314. [Context Link]

23. Heyland D, Cook D, King D, Kernerman P, Brun-Buisson C. Maximizing oxygen delivery in critically ill patients: a methodologic appraisal of the evidence. Crit Care Med 1996;24:517–524. [Context Link]

24. Ivanov R, Allen J, Sandham J, Calvin J. Pulmonary artery catheterization: a narrative and systematic critique of randomized controlled trials and recommendations for the future. New Horizons 1997;5:268–276. [Context Link]

25. Sandham J, Hull R, Brant R, Knox L, Pineo G, Doig C, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:5–14. [Context Link]

26. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics and gynecology: ACOG technical bulletin no. 175. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;42:199–205. [Context Link]

27. Clark S, Cotton D, Lee W, Bishop C, Hill T, Southwick J, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1439–1442. [Context Link]

28. Nolan TE, Wakefield ML, Devoe LD. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring in obstetrics: a critical review of its indications, benefits, complications, and alternatives. Chest 1992;101:1429–1433. [Context Link]

29. Rafferty TD, Berkowitz RL. Complications of pulmonary artery catheterization of obstetric patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1980;18:133–135. [Context Link]

30. Benedetti TJ, Cotton DB, Read JC, Miller FC. Hemodynamic observations in severe pre-eclampsia with a flow-directed pulmonary artery catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:465–470. [Context Link]

31. Bolte AC, Dekker GA, van Eyck J, van Schijndel RS, van Geijn HP. Lack of agreement between central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2000;19:261–271. [Context Link]

32. Cotton D, Gonik B, Dorman K, Harrist R. Cardiovascular alterations in severe pregnancy-induced hypertension: relationship of central venous pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:762–764. [Context Link]

33. Angus DC, Wax RS. Epidemiology of sepsis: an update. Crit Care Med 2001;29(suppl):S109–S116. [Context Link]

34. Mabie W, Barton J, Sibai B. Septic shock in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:553–561. [Context Link]

35. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368–1377. [Context Link]

36. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359–1367. [Context Link]

37. Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, Bollaert P, Francois B, Korach J, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA 2002;288:862–871. [Context Link]

38. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:699–709. [Context Link]

39. Levy M, Fink M, Marshall J, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250–1256. [Context Link]

40. Malmberg K. Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus: DIGAMI (diabetes mellitus, insulin glucose infusion in acute myocardial infarction) study group. BMJ 1997;314:1512–1515. [Context Link]

41. Cronin L, Cook D, Carlet J, Heyland D, King D, Lansang M, et al. Corticosteroid treatment for sepsis: a critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1430–1439. [Context Link]

42. Lefering R, Neugebauer E. Steroid controversy in sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1294–1303. [Context Link]

43. Shenker Y, Skatrud J. Adrenal insufficiency in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1520–1523. [Context Link]

44. Annane D. Corticosteroids for septic shock. Crit Care Med 2001;29(suppl):S117–S120. [Context Link]

45. Helal KJ, Gordon MC, Lightner CR, Barth WH Jr. Adrenal suppression induced by betamethasone in women at risk for premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:287–290. [Context Link]

46. Warren HS, Suffredini AF, Eichacker PQ, Munford RS. Risks and benefits of activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1027–1030. [Context Link]

47. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2003;348:138–150. [Context Link]

48. Matthay MA. Severe sepsis: a new treatment with both anticoagulant and antiinflammatory properties. N Engl J Med 2001;344:759–762. [Context Link]

49. Lapinsky SE, Richards GA. Pro/con clinical debate: pulmonary artery catheters increase the morbidity and mortality of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care 2003;7:101–103. [Context Link]

50. Chang J, Elam-Evans L, Berg C, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed K, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance: United States, 1991–1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003;52:1–8. [Context Link]

51. Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, Bell EA, Brown HL, Hage ML, et al. Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1228–1234. [Context Link]

52. Capeless EL, Clapp JF. Cardiovascular changes in early phase of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1449–1453. [Context Link]

53. Siu S, Sermer M, Colman J, Alvarez A, Mercier L, Morton B, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation 2001;104:515–521. [Context Link]

54. Siu S, Colman J, Sorensen S, Smallhorn J, Farine D, Amankwah K, et al. Adverse neonatal and cardiac outcomes are more common in pregnant women with cardiac disease. Circulation 2002;105:2179–2184. [Context Link]

55. Dajani A, Taubert K, Wilson W, Bolger A, Bayer A, Ferrieri P, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis: recommendations by the American Heart Association. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:1448–1458. [Context Link]

56. Kalra G, Arora R, Khan J, Nigam M, Khalillulah M. Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy for severe mitral stenosis during pregnancy. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1994;33:28–30. [Context Link]

57. Iung B, Cormier B, Elias J, Michel P, Nallet O, Porte J, et al. Usefulness of percutaneous balloon commissurotomy for mitral stenosis during pregnancy. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:398–400. [Context Link]

58. Whittemore R, Hobbins J, Engle M. Pregnancy and its outcome in women with and without surgical treatment of congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:641–651. [Context Link]

59. Savage D, Devereux R, Garrison R, Castelli W, Anderson S, Levy D, et al. Mitral valve prolapse in the general population: 2, clinical features: the Framingham study. Am Heart J 1983;106:577–581. [Context Link]

60. Lao T, Sermer M, MaGee L, Farine D, Colman J. Congenital aortic stenosis and pregnancy: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:540–545. [Context Link]

61. Pearson G, Veille J, Rahimtoola S, Hsia J, Oakley C, Hosenpud J, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Office of Rare Diseases (National Institutes of Health) workshop recommendations and review. JAMA 2000;283:1183–1188. [Context Link]

62. Tidswell M. Peripartum cardiomyopathy. Crit Care Clin 2004;20: 777–788, xi. [Context Link]

63. Whitehead S, Berg C, Chang J. Pregnancy-related mortality due to cardiomyopathy: United States, 1991–1997. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1326–1331. [Context Link]

64. Midei MG, DeMent SH, Feldman AM, Hutchins GM, Baughman KL. Peripartum myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1990;81:922–928. [Context Link]

65. Lampert M, Weinert L, Hibbard J, Korcarz C, Lindheimer M, Lang R. Contractile reserve in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and recovered left ventricular function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:189–195. [Context Link]

66. Lampert M, Weinert L, Hibbard J, Korcarz C, Lindheimer M, Lang R. Contractile reserve in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and recovered left ventricular function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:189–195. [Context Link]

67. Sutton M, Cole P, Plappert M, Saltzman D, Goldhaber S. Effects of subsequent pregnancy on left ventricular function in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 1991;121:1776–1778. [Context Link]

68. Elkayam U, Tummala P, Rao K, Akhter M, Karaalp I, Wani O, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1567–1571. [Context Link]

69. Ladner H, Danielsen B, Gilbert W. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:480–484. [Context Link]

70. Badui E, Enciso R. Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy and puerperium: a review. Angiology 1996;47:739–756. [Context Link]

71. Hankins G, Wendel G Jr., Leveno K, Stoneham J. Myocardial infarction during pregnancy: a review. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:139–146. [Context Link]

72. Roth A, Elkayam U. Acute myocardial infarction associated with pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:751–762. [Context Link]

73. Upshaw CB Jr. A study of maternal electrocardiograms recorded during labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;107:17–27. [Context Link]

74. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Vasavada BC, Sacchi TJ. Cardiac arrhythmias in pregnancy: clinical and therapeutic considerations. Int J Cardiol 2003;88:129–133. [Context Link]

75. Bobrowski R. Maternal-fetal blood gas physiology. In: Gary Dildy, eds. Critical care obstetrics. 4th ed. Malden (MA): Blackwell; 2004. p. 43–59. [Context Link]

76. Crapo RO. Normal cardiopulmonary physiology during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1996;39:3–16. [Context Link]

77. Jenkins TM, Troiano NH, Graves CR, Baird SM, Boehm FH. Mechanical ventilation in an obstetric population: characteristics and delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:549–552. [Context Link]

78. Mabie WC, Barton JR, Sibai BM. Ault respiratory distress syndrome in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:950–957. [Context Link]

79. Daily W, Katz A, Tonneson A. Beneficial effect of delivery in a patient with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 1990;72:383–386. [Context Link]

80. Tomlinson M, Caruthers T, Whitty J, Gonik B. Does delivery improve maternal condition in the respiratory-compromised gravida? Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:108–111. [Context Link]

81. Haslam PL, Hughes DA, MacNaughton PD, Baker CS, Evans TW. Surfactant replacement therapy in late-stage adult respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet 1994;343:1009–1011. [Context Link]

82. Collop NA, Sahn SA. Critical illness in pregnancy: an analysis of 20 patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. Chest 1993;103:1548–1552. [Context Link]

83. Sciscione A, Ivester T, Largoza M, Manley J, Shlossman P, Colmorgen G. Acute pulmonary edema in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:511–515. [Context Link]

84. Ronald H, Ingram J, Braunwald E. Dyspnea and pulmonary edema. In: Kasper D, Fauci A, Longo D, Braunwald E, Hauser S, Jameson J, editors. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. 16th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. [Context Link]

85. Cotton D, Gonik B, Spillman T, Dorman K. Intrapartum to postpartum changes in colloid osmotic pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;149:174–177. [Context Link]

86. Gonik B, Cotton D. Peripartum colloid osmotic pressure changes: influence of intravenous hydration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:99–100. [Context Link]

87. Zhang J, Meikle S, Trumble A. Severe maternal morbidity associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in the United States. Hypertens Pregnancy 2003;22:203–212. [Context Link]

88. Sibai BM, Mabie BC, Harvey CJ, Gonzalez AR. Pulmonary edema in severe preeclampsia-eclampsia: analysis of thirty-seven consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1174–1179. [Context Link]

89. Benedetti TJ. Life-threatening complications of beta mimetic therapy for preterm labor inhibition. Clin Perinatol 1986;13:843–852. [Context Link]

90. Mabie WC, Pernoll ML, Witty JB, Biswas MK. Pulmonary edema induced by beta mimetic drugs. South Med J 1983;76:1354–1360. [Context Link]

91. Yeast J, Halberstadt C, Meyer B, Cohen G, Thorp J. The risk of pulmonary edema and colloid osmotic pressure changes during magnesium sulfate infusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1566–1571. [Context Link]

92. Andersen B, Steffensen F, Sorensen H, Nielsen G, Olsen J. The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium: an 11-year Danish population-based study of 63,300 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:170–173. [Context Link]

93. Dizon-Towwnson D, Shah S, Phelan J. Thromboembolic disease. In: Dildy GA, eds. Critical care obstetrics. 4th ed. Malden (MA): Blackwell Science; 2004. p. 275–297. [Context Link]

94. Carson J, Kelley M, Duff A, Weg J, Fulkerson W, Palevsky H, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1240–1245. [Context Link]

95. The PIOPED investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990;263:2753–2759. [Context Link]

96. Rodger M, Wells P. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2001;103:V225–V238. [Context Link]

97. Chan W, Ray J, Murray S, Coady G, Coates G, Ginsberg J. Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1170–1175. [Context Link]

98. Hull R, Raskob G, Coates G, Panju A, Gill J. A new noninvasive strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1989;149:2549–2555. [Context Link]

99. Ginsberg J, Hirsh J, Rainbow R, Coates G. Risks to the fetus of radiologic procedures used in the diagnosis of maternal thromboembolic disease. Thromb Haemost 1989;61:189–196. [Context Link]

100. Morse M. Establishing a normal range for D-dimer levels through pregnancy to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:1202–1204. [Context Link]

101. Francalanci I, Comeglio P, Liotta A, Cellai A, Fedi S, Parretti E, et al. D-dimer concentrations during normal pregnancy, as measured by ELISA. Thromb Res 1995;78:399–405. [Context Link]

102. Powrie R, Larson L, Rosene-Montella K, Abarca M, Barbour L, Trujillo N. Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient in acute pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:394–396. [Context Link]

103. Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 2002;224:487–492. [Context Link]

104. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou K, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber S, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:2012–2017. [Context Link]

105. Doyle N, Ramirez M, Mastrobattista J, Monga M, Wagner L, Gardner M. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1019–1023. [Context Link]

106. Hudson ER, Smith TP, McDermott VG, Newman GE, Suhocki PV, Payne CS, et al. Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: complications in 1434 patients. Radiology 1996;198:61–65. [Context Link]

107. Stein P, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, Greenspan R, Hales C, Saltzman H, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1992;85:462–468. [Context Link]

108. Hyers T, Agnelli G, Hull R, Morris T, Samama M, Tapson V, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 2001;119(suppl):176S–193S. [Context Link]

109. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003;58:470–483. [Context Link]

110. Hirsh J, Guyatt G, Albers G, Schunemann H. The Seventh ACCP Conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: evidence-based guidelines. Chest 2004;126(suppl):172S–173S. [Context Link]

111. Karetzky M, Ramirez M. Acute respiratory failure in pregnancy: an analysis of 19 cases. Medicine 1998;77:41–49. [Context Link]

112. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301–1308. [Context Link]

113. Clark SL, Hankins GD, Dudley DA, Dildy GA, Porter TF. Amniotic fluid embolism: analysis of the national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1158–1167. [Context Link]

114. Davies S. Amniotic fluid embolus: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:88–98. [Context Link]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Accession Number: 00000447-200609000-00005
Copyright (c) 2000-2006 Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Version: rel10.3.2, SourceID 1.12052.1.159

servido por Rodolfo sin comentarios compártelo

sin comentarios · Escribe aquí tu comentario

Escribe tu comentario


Sobre mí

Avatar de Rodolfo

p14.9871

MVD, Uruguay
ver perfil »
contacto »

Fotos

Rodolfo Panizza todavía no ha subido ninguna foto.

¡Anímale a hacerlo!

Buscar

suscríbete

Selecciona el agregador que utilices para suscribirte a este blog (también puedes obtener la URL de los feeds):

¿Qué es esto?

Crea tu blog gratis en La Coctelera